Site icon Air Law Group

How to Stay on Top of Air Law and Airworthiness Regulations

Air law is the legal framework for aviation activities, built on the Chicago Convention and ICAO standards that states implement through national rules and oversight systems. Airworthiness is the condition of an aircraft conforming to its approved design and being safe for operation, with certification steps and ongoing compliance defined by ICAO Annex 8 and state authorities. In the U.S., airworthiness certification and maintenance of that status run through 14 CFR Part 21 and FAA policies that govern type, production, and airworthiness certification and allow revocation if the aircraft ceases to be airworthy.

Core global sources

ICAO Annex 8 provides broad standards for design approval, certificates of airworthiness, continuing airworthiness procedures, and mutual recognition principles among states. ICAO’s official Annex 8 record notes its adoption history and role within the Chicago Convention system underpinning national regulations. ICAO’s store description clarifies Annex 8 sets minimum bases while national codes supply detailed, enforceable requirements and processes for certification and oversight.

EU framework

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1321/2014 sets the EU system for continuing airworthiness, covering organizations, personnel approvals, and maintenance control across aircraft categories. EASA’s consolidated and eRules versions include Subpart M responsibilities for owners/operators and CAMO/CAMO.A requirements to ensure aircraft remain airworthy and flights only occur when conditions are met. EASA’s Easy Access Rules for Continuing Airworthiness publish the current consolidated text and revisions, serving as the one-stop reference for updates practitioners must monitor.

U.S. framework

14 CFR Part 21 covers certification procedures for products and articles, including definitions, type certificates, production approvals, and airworthiness approvals, forming the gateway to operational airworthiness status. FAA guidance explains standard vs special airworthiness certification, application mechanics, and revocation grounds when an aircraft no longer meets design or safe operation conditions. FAA’s certification portal pages also outline evolving pathways (e.g., UAS, special classes), signaling where regulatory modernization affects future compliance.

Why it matters

Annex 8 establishes the baseline for safety through uniform certification and continuing airworthiness expectations that states transpose, enabling cross-border recognition and consistent risk control. EU 1321/2014 and Part 21 operationalize those expectations into enforceable duties for owners, operators, and approved organizations, tying documentation and maintenance programs to legal flight eligibility. Failure to maintain airworthiness or comply with certification/continuing requirements can lead to grounding, certificate revocation, and regulatory action by authorities.​

Practical update sources

Interpretation principles

Anchor interpretations in Annex 8’s objectives-type design conformity and condition for safe operation-then map to the controlling regional/national code for technical detail and enforcement. In the EU, read operator and CAMO responsibilities together: ownership accountability, approved program requirements, and written-contract pathways define who must do what to keep aircraft eligible for flight. In the U.S., distinguish type/production approvals from the operational airworthiness certificate and its continued validity, aligning maintenance and configuration control to Part 21 and FAA orders.​

Monitoring habits

Exit mobile version